Search for: "T. W.1" Results 1 - 20 of 10,380
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2017, 6:30 am by Nico Cordes
Bei Verwendung der Emulsion des Beispiels 1 wurde hierdurch ein Joghurt mit einer Farbintensität b von 32 erhalten, während bei Verwendung der Vergleichsemulsion nur eine Intensität b von 29 erreicht wurde. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 5:28 am
The IRS explains what to do if you can't get a W-2 from an employer: 1. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Dies würde den Einsprechenden benachteiligen und wäre auch nicht verfahrensökonomisch. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 5:04 pm
Cats are locked in the bathroom downstairs, w/a picture of cats on the door and a please don't open the door--cats inside sign on the door. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Incoming mail was typically received between 11 am and 1 pm. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Claim 1 on file in this examination appeal read:1. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 10:08 am
Please don’t infer from these comments sympathetic to critics of Said’s “Orientalism thesis” that I align myself with the views, say, of a Martin Kramer or (the Zionist ideologue) Bernard Lewis. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 11:58 pm by Nico Cordes
G 1/12, Nr. 39 der Gründe, T 615/14, Nr. 1.7.1 der Gründe).9. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:14 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 10/25/2023 "T H E W H I T E H OU S E W A S H I N G T O N S e p t e m b e r 2 9 , 2 0 2 3 P r e s i d e n t i a l D e t e r m i n a t i o n N o . 2 0 2 3 - 1 4 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY OF STATE SUBJECT: Presidential Determination with Respect to the Efforts of Foreign Governments Regarding Trafficking in Persons Consistent with… [read post]
19 May 2017, 7:10 am by Nico Cordes
This case concerns a divisional application in which a feature was removed from claim 1 with respect to claim 1 of the parent application, and whether such removal satisfies the requirements of Art. 76(1) EPC (and equivalently Art. 123(2) if it were to be performed as amendment).This situation is dealt with by the 'essentiality test' of T 331/87.This case discusses the essentiality test as it differs across its various versions (English original vs.… [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 11:19 am by Kate Fort
Here [¶1] Shirley T. and David W. appeal from an order of the District Court (Portland, Powers, J.) denying their and the Oglala Sioux Tribe’s motions to transfer jurisdiction of this child protection matter to the Oglala Sioux Tribal Court pursuant to the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA), 25 U.S.C.S. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 1:25 pm
Defendant calls W, an eyewitness, who testifies that Defendant was in her own lane, and that Plaintiff was the one who crossed lanes.On cross-examination, Plaintiff asks W if it isn’t true that shortly after the accident, W told X, a bystander that “Defendant appeared to be looking down while she crossed lanes. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 8:58 am by VALL Blog Master
VALL membership runs from June 1 to May 31, so don't miss this opportunity to renew your commitment to your professional association. [read post]